Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Primary Tasks in 2018: Amending Your Partnership Agreement

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: February 13, 2018

Key Contacts

Back

As We Continue Through 2018, New Jersey Partnerships Should be Considering Required & Optional Amendments To Their Existing Partnership Agreement To Reflect New Tax Regime

The Internal Revenue Service’s (IRS) new Partnership Tax Audit Rules take effect on January 1, 2018. As we continue through the New Year, New Jersey partnerships (including entities such as LLCs that have elected to be taxed as partnerships) should be considering required and optional amendments to their existing partnership agreement (or operating agreement) to reflect the new tax regime.

Top Tasks for 2018: Amending Your Partnership Agreement
Photo courtesy of Raw Pixel (Unsplash.com)

Changes under the Centralized Partnership Audit Regime (CPAR)

Under the new Centralized Partnership Audit Regime (CPAR), the current rules governing partnership audits, that were originally enacted by the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (TEFRA), are repealed. In its place, the CPAR assesses and collects tax at the partnership level instead of at the level of individual partners. The applicability of any penalty or additional tax must also be determined at the partnership level.

The new tax audit rules apply to all partnerships, limited liability companies (LLCs) taxed as partnerships, and joint ventures. As more fully discussed in a prior article on the new tax audit partnership rules, the IRS regulations also establish procedures for electing out of the centralized partnership audit regime, filing administrative adjustment requests, and determining amounts owed by the partnership or its partners attributable to adjustments that arise out of an IRS exam.

Partnership Agreement Amendments

The new IRS rules do not require businesses to amend their partnership and/or operating agreements. Nonetheless, it is more than just good business sense to do so. Below are several issues to consider:

  • Designation of partnership representative: Rather than designating a “tax matters partner,” as provided under TEFRA, partnerships must now designate a “partnership representative.” While this designation need not officially be made until the filing of the partnership’s tax return for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, it is wise for businesses to proactively make this designation now and for the partners to fully discuss and understand all of the implications of this change. Given that the partnership representative has the sole authority to act on behalf of the partnership in any examination and the authority to bind the partnership for purposes of the CPAR, it is important to carefully devise a procedure for such designation and the exercise of such responsibility.
  • Partner approval of certain decisions made by partnership representative: The partnership may contractually address the powers of the partnership representative via the partnership agreement. Notably, because the actions of the partnership representative may bind all partners and the partnership, it is recommended that the partnership agreement require prior approval of certain material decisions that might be made by the partnership representative.
  • Contractual notice/participation rights: Under the CPAR, the partnership representative is the only individual (in addition to the partnership itself) with statutory rights during a tax examination, including notification rights and the right to participate in the proceeding. Accordingly, partnerships may want to better define these obligations through contract.
  • Indemnification by current and former partners of partnership tax liability under default rule: In light of the new imputed underpayment rules, the partnership agreement may also address indemnification of the partnership and its partners by each current and former partner of the partnership for the portion of any imputed underpayment attributable to that partner, as well for any costs and fees associated with any audit or legal proceeding. It should be understood that the legal exposure of the partners has changed and there will be a need for recourse and indemnity under such changed rules on a look back basis.

The CPAR dramatically alters the federal tax treatment of all forms of New Jersey partnerships. We encourage businesses that are taxed as partnerships to begin the analysis of their newly formulated compliance burdens and contact experienced counsel with any questions.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities post image

The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The SEC’s Latest Guidance on Applying Federal Securities Laws to Tokenized Securities"
Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make post image

Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Common Legal Mistakes NYC and New Jersey Business Owners Make"
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits post image

What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits"
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies post image

Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]

Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Link to post with title - "Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies"
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights post image

What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]

Author: Robert E. Levy

Link to post with title - "What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights"
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities post image

Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!