Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 21, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comAlicia Keys is known for her soulful vocals and inspiring lyrics, but her latest hit “Girl on Fire” is now the subject of a copyright lawsuit.
The 31-year-old R&B singer is facing a copyright infringement lawsuit from songwriter Earl Shuman, who argues that Keys unlawfully used lyrics from a 1969 song he wrote, entitled “Hey There Lonely Girl.” The song was recorded by Eddie Holman. The copyright infringement lawsuit only relates to two seconds of the song during the bridge, in which Keys sings “She’s a lonely girl/And it’s a lonely world.
Blogger Roger Friedman initially noticed the similarities and blogged about how in the middle of the song, “Alicia sings a couplet or so from Eddie Holman’s 1970 classic ‘Hey There Lonely Girl.’ The song was written by Leon Carr and Earl Shuman, who are both gone to rock and rock and roll heaven.”
Shulman, who co-wrote the song, responded to the blogger, and used his article in his lawsuit against Keys.
“Hi Roger, I am the co-writer of ‘Hey There Lonely Girl’ and I appreciate your recognizing an important part of ‘Lonely Girl’ in Alicia Keys’ new recording. Thanks for your expertise.”
The singer has not yet responded to the lawsuit. It’s unclear whether Shulman’s lawsuit has significant merit, as the phrase “lonely girl” is not a recurring lyric throughout the song. In addition, the remaining lyrics of the song are completely different from the 1960’s song, meaning that she may have a stronger case against the songwriter. However, the intricacies of copyright law can be complex and difficult to analyze without legal expertise, making it important for artists to retain representation when releasing music.
For more information about this case or questions about copyright law, please contact one of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Sports and Entertainment Law attorneys.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!