Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
AICPA Urges IRS to Change Home Office Deduction 'Safe Harbor' Provision
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 27, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Thousands of business owners run operations directly out of their residence each year, and many reduce their tax liabilities to the Internal Revenue Service by claiming a home office deduction.
While the write-off is perfectly legal and valid under federal tax law, home office deductions are also one of the most heavily scrutinized by IRS agents because there is a great deal of wiggle room to inflate expenses. As business owners can deduct equipment, rent, insurance premiums, and other related expenses, the IRS examines these returns closely for evidence of dishonesty.
In order to make the deductions less complex and easier to calculate, the agency recently proposed a new safe harbor method that would simplify the way business owners claim the deduction. Under the method, owners could deduct expenses at $5 per square foot for a maximum of 300 square feet of qualified home office space used. The maximum yearly deduction would be set at $1,500.
However, the American Institute of CPAs recently sent a letter to the IRS urging it to reconsider some of the safe harbor method proposals. In a letter to the agency, AICPA Tax Executive Committee chairman Jeffrey Porter asked the IRS to consider increasing the maximum deduction to between $2,000 and $3,000, according to Accounting Today.
The Institute also encourages the IRS to establish a cost-of-living adjustment to take inflation into account.
“We recommend that the IRS and Treasury re-evaluate and alter some of the details of their proposal to implement the safe harbor method,” Porter wrote, according to the news source. “For taxpayers who have been claiming (or may in the future claim) the home office deduction under the actual expense method, unanticipated administrative burdens have been created for the taxpayer, which should be considered when the IRS and Treasury draft future guidance and forms for both the safe harbor and actual methods of home office deductions.”
The IRS has not yet responded to these proposals.
- Practices: Tax and Trusts & Estates, International Law & Trade
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Why Secured Transactions Are Important
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Changes to Qualified Small Business Stock Will Benefit Startup Founders and Investors
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) significantly impacts federal taxes, credits, and deductions. A key change relating to Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) allows greater tax-free gains for investments in startups and other qualifying small businesses. Company founders and other investors should understand how the enhanced tax strategy works or risk missing […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Consolidation and Antitrust Issues in Mergers
Corporate consolidation involves two or more businesses merging to become a single larger entity. The result is often a stronger and more competitive company that can better navigate today’s competitive marketplace. What Is Corporate Consolidation? Corporate consolidation closely resembles a basic merger transaction. The primary difference is that a consolidation creates an entirely new business […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.