Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comWhen filing for a trademark, it is important to remember that you are filing for the mark as you use or plan to use it. That is, you can only file for one mark per application. For example, if you have a stylized trademark where you have one word stacked over another, while the other version has the words side by side, although the marks share identical wording, the USPTO will consider that to be two different and distinct trademarks. The same situation applies for word marks – applying for the mark TRADEMARK in one application versus use of the term TRADE MARK will be considered two separate marks.
Keeping that in mind, some applicants may try to file a trademark application where most of the mark remains consistent, but includes a changeable element. For example, an applicant may file an application for the mark TRADEMARK 19, in an effort to secure trademark protection when they use the trademark as TRADEMARK 1985 or TRADEMARK 1999. When you file for a trademark but actually use that mark with changeable element as discussed above, you may have filed an application for something called a “phantom mark.”
Aside from certain scenarios, a phantom mark is not registrable. Namely, U.S. trademark law prohibits the registration of more than one mark in an application. That is, if the mark in your trademark application can function as two or more marks, it is possible that the USPTO would reject the application on that basis. These types of rejections occur when an applicant files a statement of use or specimen which shows the mark being used with the changeable element(s). Phantom elements in marks generally involve a date (usually a year), a geographic location, or a model number that is subject to change.
Remember that the primary purpose of registration is to provide notice to potential users of the same or a confusingly similar mark, and that to serve this purpose, the mark, as registered, must accurately reflect the way it is used in commerce so that someone who searches the registers of the USPTO for the mark, or a similar mark, will locate the registered mark. As such, when seeking to apply for a trademark, it is imperative that you file that application for a mark as a whole without any changeable elements. Including changeable elements in an applied-for trademark can counter the basic trademark rule that an application must be limited to only one mark.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Nine Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Recognized in 2027 Edition of Best Lawyers in America® Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that nine of its attorneys have been recognized in the 2027 edition of The Best Lawyers in America® and Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch in America®. First published in 1983, Best Lawyers is universally regarded […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Environmental Law Scholarship Recipient Talha Iqbal! Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has awarded the second annual Theodore A. Schwartz Scholarship for Environmental Law to Talha Iqbal, a rising third-year student at Rutgers Law School in Newark. Mr. Iqbal will receive $2,500 to support his continued legal education. The Environmental Law Scholarship is awarded annually […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Two Partners, a Counsel, and a Senior Associate Deepen the Firm’s Litigation Bench in Little Falls, Red Bank, and New York City Following last month’s announcement that eight attorneys joined the firm, Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC continues its expansion, this time strengthening its Litigation Group. The firm welcomes Paul S. Grossman and Jay R. McDaniel as […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Unanimous Controversies Committee ruling addresses the scope of an athletic association’s disciplinary authority and the procedural standards governing its exercise. Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC announced today that Partner Robert E. Levy served as counsel to the New Jersey State Interscholastic Athletic Association (NJSIAA) in the proceedings that resulted in the revocation of the 2025 regional and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck Congratulates Partners Mark Tabakin, Donald Scarinci, and Don Pepe for Inclusion in NJBIZ’s 2026 Power 50 in Law List Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that Donald Scarinci, Founding & Managing Partner, Donald M. Pepe, Partner of the firm’s Commercial Real Estate Department, and Mark A. Tabakin, Partner in the firm’s Public […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC has been named to the NJBIZ 2026 Best Places to Work in New Jersey, earning recognition in the Medium Companies category (50 to 249 employees). Now in its latest edition, the annual program honors New Jersey organizations that go beyond the paycheck to invest in their employees’ growth and quality of life. […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!