Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
When filing for a trademark, it is important to remember that you are filing for the mark as you use or plan to use it. That is, you can only file for one mark per application. For example, if you have a stylized trademark where you have one word stacked over another, while the other version has the words side by side, although the marks share identical wording, the USPTO will consider that to be two different and distinct trademarks. The same situation applies for word marks – applying for the mark TRADEMARK in one application versus use of the term TRADE MARK will be considered two separate marks.
Keeping that in mind, some applicants may try to file a trademark application where most of the mark remains consistent, but includes a changeable element. For example, an applicant may file an application for the mark TRADEMARK 19, in an effort to secure trademark protection when they use the trademark as TRADEMARK 1985 or TRADEMARK 1999. When you file for a trademark but actually use that mark with changeable element as discussed above, you may have filed an application for something called a “phantom mark.”
Aside from certain scenarios, a phantom mark is not registrable. Namely, U.S. trademark law prohibits the registration of more than one mark in an application. That is, if the mark in your trademark application can function as two or more marks, it is possible that the USPTO would reject the application on that basis. These types of rejections occur when an applicant files a statement of use or specimen which shows the mark being used with the changeable element(s). Phantom elements in marks generally involve a date (usually a year), a geographic location, or a model number that is subject to change.
Remember that the primary purpose of registration is to provide notice to potential users of the same or a confusingly similar mark, and that to serve this purpose, the mark, as registered, must accurately reflect the way it is used in commerce so that someone who searches the registers of the USPTO for the mark, or a similar mark, will locate the registered mark. As such, when seeking to apply for a trademark, it is imperative that you file that application for a mark as a whole without any changeable elements. Including changeable elements in an applied-for trademark can counter the basic trademark rule that an application must be limited to only one mark.
- Practices: Intellectual Property
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Business Journal NJBIZ Names Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. Leaders in Law
Ronald S. Bienstock and William C. Sullivan, Jr. of Scarinci Hollenbeck Recognized as 2025 Leaders in Law by NJBIZ Little Falls, NJ – March 6, 2025 – One of New Jersey’s leading business journals, NJBIZ, has recognized Ronald S. Bienstock, Partner and Chair of the Intellectual Property Group, and William C. Sullivan, Jr., Partner and […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Scarinci Hollenbeck Named Among 2025 Best Companies to Work For
Scarinci Hollenbeck Named in U.S. News & World Report’s 2025 Best Companies to Work For Law Firms Little Falls, NJ – March 4, 2025 − U.S. News & World Report, the global authority in rankings and consumer advice, has named Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC one of the best law firms to work for in its […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Donald M. Pepe and Donald Scarinci Named to 2025 ROI-NJ Influencers: Law List
ROI-NJ Continues to Feature Donald Scarinci and Donald M. Pepe on Annual Influencers in Law List Little Falls, NJ – February 26, 2025 – Partner and Chair of Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC’s Commercial Real Estate Department Donald M. Pepe and Founding & Managing Partner Donald Scarinci have once again been named to ROI-NJ’s Influencers: Law […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Tax, Trusts and Estates Partner Marc J. Comer and Three Senior Associates Join Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC Little Falls, NJ – February 20, 2025 – Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce the addition of one new Partner. The firm also welcomes three Senior Associate attorneys. The expansion strengthens the firm’s capabilities across several practice […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Scarinci Hollenbeck Attorneys Launch New BNI Chapter in NYC
Pioneering Networking Opportunities: James M. Meaney, Jesse M. Dimitro, and Christopher D. Warren Lead Initiative to Enhance Business Collaboration and Growth New York, NY – February 13, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that James M. Meaney, Jesse M. Dimitro, and Christopher D. Warren have taken the initiative to establish a […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
John M. Scagnelli Speaks at Annual Redevelopment Law Institute
John M. Scagnelli Featured as Panelist on “The Impact that the Proposed Resilient Environments and Landscapes (NJ PACT) Regulations will have on Redevelopment” Little Falls, NJ – January 29, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is proud to announce that Partner John M. Scagnelli, a member of the firm’s Environmental Law section, was recently featured […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Phantom Marks
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
When filing for a trademark, it is important to remember that you are filing for the mark as you use or plan to use it. That is, you can only file for one mark per application. For example, if you have a stylized trademark where you have one word stacked over another, while the other version has the words side by side, although the marks share identical wording, the USPTO will consider that to be two different and distinct trademarks. The same situation applies for word marks – applying for the mark TRADEMARK in one application versus use of the term TRADE MARK will be considered two separate marks.
Keeping that in mind, some applicants may try to file a trademark application where most of the mark remains consistent, but includes a changeable element. For example, an applicant may file an application for the mark TRADEMARK 19, in an effort to secure trademark protection when they use the trademark as TRADEMARK 1985 or TRADEMARK 1999. When you file for a trademark but actually use that mark with changeable element as discussed above, you may have filed an application for something called a “phantom mark.”
Aside from certain scenarios, a phantom mark is not registrable. Namely, U.S. trademark law prohibits the registration of more than one mark in an application. That is, if the mark in your trademark application can function as two or more marks, it is possible that the USPTO would reject the application on that basis. These types of rejections occur when an applicant files a statement of use or specimen which shows the mark being used with the changeable element(s). Phantom elements in marks generally involve a date (usually a year), a geographic location, or a model number that is subject to change.
Remember that the primary purpose of registration is to provide notice to potential users of the same or a confusingly similar mark, and that to serve this purpose, the mark, as registered, must accurately reflect the way it is used in commerce so that someone who searches the registers of the USPTO for the mark, or a similar mark, will locate the registered mark. As such, when seeking to apply for a trademark, it is imperative that you file that application for a mark as a whole without any changeable elements. Including changeable elements in an applied-for trademark can counter the basic trademark rule that an application must be limited to only one mark.