Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comClient Alert
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 6, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Small Business Association (SBA), under pressure to make sure that the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) funds are properly distributed and used, is closely scrutinizing the recipients of PPP resources. Further, large corporations are facing public (and potential legal) backlash for participating in the program, which is designed to help small businesses.

The SBA resumed accepting Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) applications from April 27, 2020, after receiving a second round of Congressionally appropriated funding through bi-partisan legislation. As discussed in greater detail in our other articles, the new federal guaranteed, unsecured loan program aims to help businesses keep workers on their payroll amid the economic challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The PPP loans are forgivable (converted to a grant) but the portion that is forgiven can be impacted based on hitting certain criteria, including whether the requisite threshold of employees is kept on the payrolls at the threshold salary level for eight weeks, and ensuring that the PPP funds are used for payroll, rent, mortgage interest, or utilities or other permitted purposes.
Loans are available to (provided the program has the funding):
Recipients may use the loans to cover the following, subject to certain limitations:
When applying for a PPP loan, businesses must provide a good faith certification that the loan is needed to address the economic uncertainty caused by COVID-19 and that loan funds will be used to maintain payroll and make other necessary payments. The specific language of the certification included in the PPP application is: “[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.”
On April 21, 2020, U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin addressed concerns that large corporations were taking advantage of the PPP at the expense of small businesses. He warned of “severe consequences” for large companies that took advantage of PPP loans, although technically qualifying for aid. “If, to the extent these companies didn’t understand this and they repay the loans, that will be okay,” Mnuchin said. “And if not, there’ll be potentially other consequences.”
On April 23, the SBA updated its Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) to officially address loan eligibility requirements. The guidance also states that the SBA will provide amnesty to companies who repay their loans by May 7, 2020. Below is the text of Question 31:
Question: Do businesses owned by large companies with adequate sources of liquidity to support the business’s ongoing operations qualify for a PPP loan?
Answer: In addition to reviewing applicable affiliation rules to determine eligibility, all borrowers must assess their economic need for a PPP loan under the standard established by the CARES Act and the PPP regulations at the time of the loan application. Although the CARES Act suspends the ordinary requirement that borrowers must be unable to obtain credit elsewhere (as defined in section 3(h) of the Small Business Act), borrowers still must certify in good faith that their PPP loan request is necessary. Specifically, before submitting a PPP application, all borrowers should review carefully the required certification that “[c]urrent economic uncertainty makes this loan request necessary to support the ongoing operations of the Applicant.” Borrowers must make this certification in good faith, taking into account their current business activity and their ability to access other sources of liquidity sufficient to support their ongoing operations in a manner that is not significantly detrimental to the business. For example, it is unlikely that a public company with substantial market value and access to capital markets will be able to make the required certification in good faith, and such a company should be prepared to demonstrate to SBA, upon request, the basis for its certification.
Lenders may rely on a borrower’s certification regarding the necessity of the loan request. Any borrower that applied for a PPP loan prior to the issuance of this guidance and repays the loan in full by May 7, 2020 will be deemed by SBA to have made the required certification in good faith.
Going forward, the SBA will be more closely scrutinizing larger loans. On April 28, Mnuchin and SBA Administrator Jovita Carranza issued a statement that there would be a review procedure for PPP loans in excess of $2 million. “We have noted the large number of companies that have appropriately reevaluated their need for PPP loans and promptly repaid loan funds in response to SBA guidance reminding all borrowers of an important certification required to obtain a PPP loan,” Mnuchin and Carranza said in the statement. “To further ensure PPP loans are limited to eligible borrowers, the SBA has decided, in consultation with the Department of the Treasury, that it will review all loans in excess of $2 million, in addition to other loans as appropriate, following the lender’s submission of the borrower’s loan forgiveness application. Regulatory guidance implementing this procedure will be forthcoming.”
Additional guidance and enforcement is on the horizon. In the meantime, companies that have previously obtained or applied for a PPP loan should review the basis for their certification to verify that they can demonstrate the PPP loan was necessary. It is also advisable to reconfirm that you meet all the other elements of eligibility in consultations with your accountants and attorneys. Scarinci Hollenbeck is here to help.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

On January 29, 2026, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 58 of 2026, adding a new chapter to the New York City Administrative Code that imposes statutory deadlines on cooperative boards when reviewing purchase applications that require board approval. The law addresses longstanding concerns about protracted and unpredictable co-op approval timelines and will […]
Author: Scott E. Koop

On January 5, 2026, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a published decision in In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 7:1C, rejecting consolidated challenges filed by industry and labor petitioners to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Environmental Justice Rules. The decision affirms NJDEP’s authority to implement New Jersey’s 2020 Environmental Justice […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

On November 18, 2025, President Trump nominated M. Carter Crow, the Global Head of Labor and Employment at Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, to be General Counsel of the EEOC. Carter Crow focuses his practice on wage and hour litigation, contracts, and restrictive covenants. As of this writing, Carter Crow has yet to be voted out […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

What the Commission’s New Majority Means for Workplace Enforcement and Employer Compliance On October 7, 2025, the U.S. Senate confirmed President Trump’s nomination of Brittany Bull Panuccio to a vacant seat on the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or the Commission). Commissioner Panuccio’s confirmation grants EEOC a quorum for the first time since President Trump’s […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

As discussed in prior updates, Governor Hochul’s administration has proposed targeted adjustments to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) to reduce procedural delay for certain housing projects that do not present significant environmental impacts. These proposals are part of the Governor’s 2026 agenda and include targeted SEQRA exemptions, geographic eligibility limits, floodplain exclusions, and […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop

New York State is pursuing a significant reform initiative aimed at reducing procedural delays associated with the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) for certain housing projects. The proposal, which is part of Governor Kathy Hochul’s 2026 State of the State agenda under the “Let Them Build” initiative, seeks to create targeted exemptions from SEQRA […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!