Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
In a last-minute announcement, Chicago-based Calumet Photographic announced that it was filing for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law on March 12, according to The Wall Street Journal. The chain announced its plan to liquidate “with a heavy heart” on Facebook, saying that it would be closing all of its U.S. locations, though it will still be operating in Europe.
According to the news source, Calumet Photographic is just one of the several photography chains that have announced bankruptcy filings in recent years. Ritz Camera, for example, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2009. After the filing, Ritz was bought by members of the founding family, who had plans to revive it, but in 2012 the company was forced to liquidate when it declared bankruptcy again.
In court papers filed with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Chicago, there are two, separate bankruptcies: Calumet Photographic, Inc., and the company’s website, Calumetphoto.com, LLC filed separately. While Calumet Photographic, Inc. listed between $50 million to $100 million in assets and only $10 million to $50 million in liabilities, Calumetphoto.com, LLC listed another $10 million to $50 million in liabilities and less than $50,000 in assets.
The main company Calumet also seems to have waited until the last possible moment to announce its closure, according to PetaPixel. A former employee of the company told the news source about just how late the internal notice went around.
“According to my coworker, management was notified of this decision late last night, and told not to open for work the next day,” the former employee said. “My friend is still waiting to hear when/if he will be allowed to go back to the store and collect some personal belongings left on his desk.”
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Bankruptcy Litigation
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Is Your New Jersey Business Subject To Extended Producer Responsibility Obligations in Other States?
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) has quickly transformed from a niche policy idea into a nationwide regulatory framework that directly affects companies of every size. Rather than viewing waste management as purely a municipal function, state EPR laws shift financial and operational responsibility for the collection, recycling, and disposal of products and packaging materials onto the […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
New Jersey’s “Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act” Signed Into Law: NJ Businesses Face New Compliance Deadline
On January 12, Governor Murphy signed the “Protecting Against Forever Chemicals Act” into law. The new statute is designed to reduce public exposure to perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, commonly known as PFAS. These chemicals, often called “forever chemicals,” are used widely in consumer products for their water, oil, and grease resistance. They persist in the […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
NJDEP ADOPTS LAND USE RULES TO ADDRESS CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS
On January 20, 2026, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection adopted amendments to its land use regulatory program to address the risks posed by climate change to New Jersey residents, their property, and the natural environment. Called the Resilient Environments And Landscapes (“REAL”) Rules. Originally proposed in 2024, these regulations faced substantial opposition, prompting […]
Author: William Sullivan
New Mandatory Timelines for Review of Cooperative Purchase Applications
On January 29, 2026, the New York City Council enacted Local Law 58 of 2026, adding a new chapter to the New York City Administrative Code that imposes statutory deadlines on cooperative boards when reviewing purchase applications that require board approval. The law addresses longstanding concerns about protracted and unpredictable co-op approval timelines and will […]
Author: Scott E. Koop
New Jersey Appellate Division Affirms NJDEP Environmental Justice Rules – What Regulated Entities Need to Know
On January 5, 2026, the New Jersey Appellate Division issued a published decision in In the Matter of the Adoption of N.J.A.C. 7:1C, rejecting consolidated challenges filed by industry and labor petitioners to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Environmental Justice Rules. The decision affirms NJDEP’s authority to implement New Jersey’s 2020 Environmental Justice […]
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
EEOC Enforcement Priorities Take Shape Under New General Counsel Leadership
On November 18, 2025, President Trump nominated M. Carter Crow, the Global Head of Labor and Employment at Norton Rose Fulbright LLP, to be General Counsel of the EEOC. Carter Crow focuses his practice on wage and hour litigation, contracts, and restrictive covenants. As of this writing, Carter Crow has yet to be voted out […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.