Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 17, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn order to remain an amateur athlete, the NCAA says a college athlete can’t have a contract with a professional team, salary for participating in athletics, prize money above actual and necessary expenses and benefits from an agent or prospective agent.

However, a recent court decision – O’Bannon vs. the NCAA – could help any college athlete earn money in the future. A federal judge ruled that football and basketball players in major programs could challenge NCAA rules that prohibit compensation beyond the value of their athletic scholarships. It wasn’t a complete victory for collegiate athletes though, as the judge ruled that they aren’t able to recoup past damages.
One of the biggest arguments NCAA athletes have is that rules prevent them from turning professional when they desire. Baseball players have to stay in college for three years if they pass on being drafted out of high school. Basketball players must attend college for one year before becoming eligible for the NBA draft. Football players also have to be in school for three years before draft eligibility is granted. As a note, this three-year period also applies to athletes who have been redshirted. Johnny Manziel is likely to declare for the draft, despite only playing for two seasons, as he was a redshirt freshman – this year of inactivity counts toward the three-year rule.
Athletes could argue that these rules are preventing them from earning wages. And, what happens if they get injured while participating in collegiate athletics and can no longer pursue a professional career? Sure, they could take out an insurance policy on themselves but that may not make up for the millions that the select few could earn.
With these issues facing the NCAA, it will be interesting to see how the organization moves forward. Will athletes be paid? Will they be able to go straight to the pros? Only time will tell.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!