Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Trial date set for lawsuit against University of Tennessee concerning athletics department
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 23, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
A trial date has finally been set for the case in which female employees and sports staff at the University of Tennessee allege the institution unlawfully discriminated them and then retaliated against them for speaking out.
U.S. District Judge Pamela Reeves recently scheduled a trial for April 21, 2015, whereupon Jenny Moshak, Heather Mason and Collin Schlosser will seek a ruling against the educational institution as part of a suit they first filed in October 2012, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. The three plaintiffs allege that the university knowingly prevented female employees from earning equal pay, instating a “testosterone wall” that awarded employees who held positions on the men’s athletic teams more compensation, despite them performing the same tasks for women’s teams.
Moshak formerly served as the school’s associate director of sports medicine, while Mason and Schlosser were previously employed as strength coaches for the Lady Vols, the news source noted.
Each plaintiff is no longer affiliated with the University of Tennessee, having previously parted ways for the strangest of reasons, according to the Knoxville News Sentinel. Schlosser was reportedly terminated on April 16, 2012, along with 15 other UT athletic department employees, while Mason was relieved of her duties and responsibilities a year ago. In addition, Moshak opted to retire early from the school over issues regarding the lawsuit.
This isn’t the only suit concerning discrimination that has recently been filed against the University of Tennessee, however. U.S. District Judge Karen Caldwell set a trial date for April 27, 2015 to hear former Lady Vols media director, Debby Jennings’ case against the school and its athletic director, Dave Hart, according to the newspaper. As UT consolidated its men’s and women’s athletic departments in May 2012, Jennings alleges that age and sex discrimination forced her into early retirement after 35 years on the job.
In order to prove discrimination was indeed a factor, the plaintiffs will need to be able to produce direct evidence or provide clear proof through pretext and statistics, as well as previous cases of discrimination.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Trial date set for lawsuit against University of Tennessee concerning athletics department
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
A trial date has finally been set for the case in which female employees and sports staff at the University of Tennessee allege the institution unlawfully discriminated them and then retaliated against them for speaking out.
U.S. District Judge Pamela Reeves recently scheduled a trial for April 21, 2015, whereupon Jenny Moshak, Heather Mason and Collin Schlosser will seek a ruling against the educational institution as part of a suit they first filed in October 2012, according to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. The three plaintiffs allege that the university knowingly prevented female employees from earning equal pay, instating a “testosterone wall” that awarded employees who held positions on the men’s athletic teams more compensation, despite them performing the same tasks for women’s teams.
Moshak formerly served as the school’s associate director of sports medicine, while Mason and Schlosser were previously employed as strength coaches for the Lady Vols, the news source noted.
Each plaintiff is no longer affiliated with the University of Tennessee, having previously parted ways for the strangest of reasons, according to the Knoxville News Sentinel. Schlosser was reportedly terminated on April 16, 2012, along with 15 other UT athletic department employees, while Mason was relieved of her duties and responsibilities a year ago. In addition, Moshak opted to retire early from the school over issues regarding the lawsuit.
This isn’t the only suit concerning discrimination that has recently been filed against the University of Tennessee, however. U.S. District Judge Karen Caldwell set a trial date for April 27, 2015 to hear former Lady Vols media director, Debby Jennings’ case against the school and its athletic director, Dave Hart, according to the newspaper. As UT consolidated its men’s and women’s athletic departments in May 2012, Jennings alleges that age and sex discrimination forced her into early retirement after 35 years on the job.
In order to prove discrimination was indeed a factor, the plaintiffs will need to be able to produce direct evidence or provide clear proof through pretext and statistics, as well as previous cases of discrimination.