Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: August 19, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMany sports analysts are watching the ascent of Fox Sports 1 as it makes multi-year television network contracts with several sports leagues, most recently the United States Golf Association and NASCAR. However, some of these deals – particularly the agreement with NASCAR – seem ill-advised on the surface, and do not appear to financially favor the television sports network, leaving some to question why these deals were made.
For example, NASCAR recently announced a hefty $8.2 billion, 10-year television deal with NBC and Fox, despite the fact that NASCAR’s ratings and audience level have experienced significant declines over the years. So why enter into a multibillion-dollar contract with flailing sports? Several reasons. The industry is a lucrative one, and many networks dominate and gain a greater market share than others. For example, Fox Sports 1 is still in its infancy and NBC is still emerging as a sports network, and entering into a number of agreements with popular sports leagues allow them to compete with mega-networks, such as ESPN.
“All it takes is two bidders to drive up the price … If NBC hadn’t been there and didn’t have an agenda building a sports network, then the financial outcome might not have been as great,” said Zak Brown, president of Just Marketing.
In addition, the networks and the leagues often avoid “cookie-cutter” type legal agreements and establish terms that help advance their unique goals. For instance, Fox and NBC, in an effort to attract NASCAR and other sports leagues, wrote out large checks and avoided dropping rights fees that other large-scale networks refused to consider, Sporting News reported of the transaction. However, the two new networks may earn more in subscriptions by offering viewers a more comprehensive sports package. Networks such as ESPN are already engaged with viewers and established as popular channels, meaning they have more leverage when negotiating contracts and may be less willing to make concessions.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Many sports analysts are watching the ascent of Fox Sports 1 as it makes multi-year television network contracts with several sports leagues, most recently the United States Golf Association and NASCAR. However, some of these deals – particularly the agreement with NASCAR – seem ill-advised on the surface, and do not appear to financially favor the television sports network, leaving some to question why these deals were made.
For example, NASCAR recently announced a hefty $8.2 billion, 10-year television deal with NBC and Fox, despite the fact that NASCAR’s ratings and audience level have experienced significant declines over the years. So why enter into a multibillion-dollar contract with flailing sports? Several reasons. The industry is a lucrative one, and many networks dominate and gain a greater market share than others. For example, Fox Sports 1 is still in its infancy and NBC is still emerging as a sports network, and entering into a number of agreements with popular sports leagues allow them to compete with mega-networks, such as ESPN.
“All it takes is two bidders to drive up the price … If NBC hadn’t been there and didn’t have an agenda building a sports network, then the financial outcome might not have been as great,” said Zak Brown, president of Just Marketing.
In addition, the networks and the leagues often avoid “cookie-cutter” type legal agreements and establish terms that help advance their unique goals. For instance, Fox and NBC, in an effort to attract NASCAR and other sports leagues, wrote out large checks and avoided dropping rights fees that other large-scale networks refused to consider, Sporting News reported of the transaction. However, the two new networks may earn more in subscriptions by offering viewers a more comprehensive sports package. Networks such as ESPN are already engaged with viewers and established as popular channels, meaning they have more leverage when negotiating contracts and may be less willing to make concessions.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!