Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Tattoos May Bring on a Host of New Legal Complications for Athletes, Businesses
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 13, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
Professional athletes may be accustomed to a slew of potential lawsuits stemming from sports violations, contract issues, defamation and slander, union agreements, and injuries. But a new and unexpected issue may be on the forefront that could pose new legal complications for athletes, game makers, and the sports industry: tattoos.
In recent years, a string of copyright infringement lawsuits have been brought against various organizations and businesses when they display players – and their identifying tattoos – in video games, commercials, promotional materials, and other media coverage without crediting the tattoo artist. Bloomberg recalled a 2009 case in which tattoo artist Christopher Escobedo sued game maker THQ for displaying a tattoo he created for martial arts fighter Carlos Condit in a video game. Escobedo claimed he received no recognition for an “exact replica” of his art.
Several other cases have emerged since then, and given the largely unchartered territory of how tattoos may be treated under federal copyright law, athletes, sports unions, leagues and third-party businesses are expected to see an uptick in these cases, which may provide some clarity to this thorny issue. Currently, many judges are in agreement that under existing copyright laws, tattoos fall under the “modicum of creativity” clause that enables them to be copyrighted.
The bigger question is how courts will treat images displayed on a person’s skin once that person has left the tattoo parlor and chooses to display the images elsewhere. Does that individual then have ownership of the art, and therefore the discretion to give game makers and other parties permission to use their likeness without giving attribution to the tattoo artist? Or, in instances where artists create a unique image for a player, do tattoo artists then have more discretion over how these images are viewed? Even more complex is whether these artists should be able to register and copyright unique images to prohibit athletes from displaying them on or off the field.
As the courts set new precedents surrounding the treatment of tattoos under copyright law, players and businesses may need to tread more carefully to avoid potentially costly litigation.
- Practices: Copyright
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Tattoos May Bring on a Host of New Legal Complications for Athletes, Businesses
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Professional athletes may be accustomed to a slew of potential lawsuits stemming from sports violations, contract issues, defamation and slander, union agreements, and injuries. But a new and unexpected issue may be on the forefront that could pose new legal complications for athletes, game makers, and the sports industry: tattoos.
In recent years, a string of copyright infringement lawsuits have been brought against various organizations and businesses when they display players – and their identifying tattoos – in video games, commercials, promotional materials, and other media coverage without crediting the tattoo artist. Bloomberg recalled a 2009 case in which tattoo artist Christopher Escobedo sued game maker THQ for displaying a tattoo he created for martial arts fighter Carlos Condit in a video game. Escobedo claimed he received no recognition for an “exact replica” of his art.
Several other cases have emerged since then, and given the largely unchartered territory of how tattoos may be treated under federal copyright law, athletes, sports unions, leagues and third-party businesses are expected to see an uptick in these cases, which may provide some clarity to this thorny issue. Currently, many judges are in agreement that under existing copyright laws, tattoos fall under the “modicum of creativity” clause that enables them to be copyrighted.
The bigger question is how courts will treat images displayed on a person’s skin once that person has left the tattoo parlor and chooses to display the images elsewhere. Does that individual then have ownership of the art, and therefore the discretion to give game makers and other parties permission to use their likeness without giving attribution to the tattoo artist? Or, in instances where artists create a unique image for a player, do tattoo artists then have more discretion over how these images are viewed? Even more complex is whether these artists should be able to register and copyright unique images to prohibit athletes from displaying them on or off the field.
As the courts set new precedents surrounding the treatment of tattoos under copyright law, players and businesses may need to tread more carefully to avoid potentially costly litigation.