Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 30, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe athlete contends that the event was an accident and that he thought he was acting to protect himself and Steenkamp against an intruder, according to the LA Times. Defense lawyers used a testimony from expert witness psychiatrist, Merryll Vorster, to try to show that Pistorius suffered from an anxiety disorder. This disorder, coupled with feelings of fear and vulnerability over what he thought was an intruder, caused it to seem reasonable for him to fire four shots through a bathroom door, they say. The prosecution argues that Pistorius intended to kill Steenkamp after an argument.
Vorster said that Pistorius’ reaction to the perceived threat in the early hours of Feb. 14, 2013, would have been necessarily different from that of a “normal, able-bodied person without generalized anxiety disorder,” according to the BBC. She went on to say that this would not have affected his ability to tell right from wrong and that it was up to the court to rule as to whether his anxiety disorder diminished his legal responsibility.
Judge Thokozile Masipa handed down a ruling after this testimony in which she said that the court had no choice but to refer him for a full psychiatric evaluation, the LA Times reported. Masipa explained that her aim was not to punish Pistorius twice, but to ensure that justice would be done. She also raised the possibility that Pistorius be treated as an outpatient, rather than forcing him to stay overnight for the entire 30-day assessment.
If Oscar Pistorius is found guilty of murder,the national sporting hero could face life in prison. If he is acquitted, the court must then consider the alternate charge of culpable homicide, for which he would face up to 15 years.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!