Are networks and producers liable when reality TV takes a wrong turn?
If there’s one thing audiences have seen repeatedly on reality television shows, it is people getting hurt.
Programs such as “Naked and Afraid” and “Deadliest Catch” depict people in dangerous and even life-threatening situations. Other times, bystanders are caught up in the action in ways they would prefer not to be. Depending on the various situations that reality TV stars and the people who cross their paths find themselves in, there may be different legal solutions or expectations. For example, some reality TV shows may feature people breaking the law, such as an episode of “Intervention” in which Pam, an alcoholic featured on the show, decided to drive drunk.
When Pam got into her car and drove off, the TV crew members did little to stop her, and however one may look at that decision ethically, legally it was completely within their rights to let her drive away drunk, The New York Times reported. In these situations, the staff members on the scene are treated like witnesses. In the U.S., there is no law requiring witnesses to get involved in a crime, such as drunk driving. Since producers aren’t legally required to stop crimes in progress or save people from dangerous situations, it is difficult to hold them legally responsible for the behavior of reality TV stars.
A&E, the television network behind “Intervention,” told the media outlet that the show has never been sued. This, despite the fact that it often features people in dangerous situations, is due to its focus on drug and alcohol use. The show’s producers do take steps to avoid being accused of negligence, however, such as keeping a family member on call and having potential subjects undergo evaluations.
When bystanders become part of the action
Other times, reality TV stars don’t just put themselves in danger, though. The producers of the MTV television show “Jersey Shore” have been sued more than once after cast members were involved in fights. One lawsuit was dropped after the defendant, Sammi Giancola, left the jurisdiction – Florida. Giancola, or “Sammi Sweetheart,” was accused of punching a woman. In another case, a Superior Court judge from Toms River allowed RICO and assault charges to stand against MTV, the show’s producers and the crew.
While networks and producers aren’t required to step in when a crime is being committed, they can certainly be pulled into a lawsuit when someone not involved with the television show ends up getting hurt. The “Jersey Shore” cast’s many run-ins with the law can attest to the possibility that bystanders file lawsuits against reality TV stars, producers and networks. If nothing else, these cases can result in bad publicity. At the time the “Jersey Shore” was on the air, MTV was subjected to numerous attacks by groups opposed to show’s content.
“Liability depends on whether reality TV stars are employees.”
Employees or independent contractors?
Other times, cast members themselves are hurt or placed in dangerous situations. In these cases, where it isn’t the individuals themselves who create the dangerous circumstance – such as Pam drunk driving – legal responsibility comes down to whether reality TV stars are employees or independent contractors, according to the Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law. If cast members are deemed to be employees, they are legally entitled to workers compensation should they get hurt on the job. Additionally, some state labor laws may allow further protections.
While there are multiple factors used to determine whether or not someone is an employee, the degree of control the employer holds over the individual is important in regards to reality TV. Some television shows, such as “Survivor,” require plenty of control over participants. While others, that follow cast members more than ask them to perform stunts or compete, have less control, which could make regularly appearing personalities independent contractors.
Whatever the situation, reality TV stars frequently find themselves in potentially dangerous situations whether they are stranded on desert islands or drinking in a New Jersey club.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Are Networks and Producers Liable When Reality TV Gets Dangerous?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Are networks and producers liable when reality TV takes a wrong turn?
If there’s one thing audiences have seen repeatedly on reality television shows, it is people getting hurt.
Programs such as “Naked and Afraid” and “Deadliest Catch” depict people in dangerous and even life-threatening situations. Other times, bystanders are caught up in the action in ways they would prefer not to be. Depending on the various situations that reality TV stars and the people who cross their paths find themselves in, there may be different legal solutions or expectations. For example, some reality TV shows may feature people breaking the law, such as an episode of “Intervention” in which Pam, an alcoholic featured on the show, decided to drive drunk.
When Pam got into her car and drove off, the TV crew members did little to stop her, and however one may look at that decision ethically, legally it was completely within their rights to let her drive away drunk, The New York Times reported. In these situations, the staff members on the scene are treated like witnesses. In the U.S., there is no law requiring witnesses to get involved in a crime, such as drunk driving. Since producers aren’t legally required to stop crimes in progress or save people from dangerous situations, it is difficult to hold them legally responsible for the behavior of reality TV stars.
A&E, the television network behind “Intervention,” told the media outlet that the show has never been sued. This, despite the fact that it often features people in dangerous situations, is due to its focus on drug and alcohol use. The show’s producers do take steps to avoid being accused of negligence, however, such as keeping a family member on call and having potential subjects undergo evaluations.
When bystanders become part of the action
Other times, reality TV stars don’t just put themselves in danger, though. The producers of the MTV television show “Jersey Shore” have been sued more than once after cast members were involved in fights. One lawsuit was dropped after the defendant, Sammi Giancola, left the jurisdiction – Florida. Giancola, or “Sammi Sweetheart,” was accused of punching a woman. In another case, a Superior Court judge from Toms River allowed RICO and assault charges to stand against MTV, the show’s producers and the crew.
While networks and producers aren’t required to step in when a crime is being committed, they can certainly be pulled into a lawsuit when someone not involved with the television show ends up getting hurt. The “Jersey Shore” cast’s many run-ins with the law can attest to the possibility that bystanders file lawsuits against reality TV stars, producers and networks. If nothing else, these cases can result in bad publicity. At the time the “Jersey Shore” was on the air, MTV was subjected to numerous attacks by groups opposed to show’s content.
“Liability depends on whether reality TV stars are employees.”
Employees or independent contractors?
Other times, cast members themselves are hurt or placed in dangerous situations. In these cases, where it isn’t the individuals themselves who create the dangerous circumstance – such as Pam drunk driving – legal responsibility comes down to whether reality TV stars are employees or independent contractors, according to the Seton Hall Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law. If cast members are deemed to be employees, they are legally entitled to workers compensation should they get hurt on the job. Additionally, some state labor laws may allow further protections.
While there are multiple factors used to determine whether or not someone is an employee, the degree of control the employer holds over the individual is important in regards to reality TV. Some television shows, such as “Survivor,” require plenty of control over participants. While others, that follow cast members more than ask them to perform stunts or compete, have less control, which could make regularly appearing personalities independent contractors.
Whatever the situation, reality TV stars frequently find themselves in potentially dangerous situations whether they are stranded on desert islands or drinking in a New Jersey club.
