Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Jay Z's Two Lines of Legal Defense

Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC

Date: September 17, 2014

Key Contacts

Back

It’s no secret that when celebrities end up in court, their legal defense and the counsel they bring with them, is the best of the best.

The current lawsuit involving Jay Z and sound engineer Chauncey Mahan is no different. The case is anything but straightforward, but the heart of it is nothing new. Mahan alleges to have worked on 45 songs with the hip-hop star, including “Things That U Do,” “Big Pimpin” and numerous unpublished outtakes from Vol 3… The Life and Times of S. Carter.

Jay-Z
By i am guilty (JAY-Z) [CC BY-SA 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

Mahan is an industry celebrity in his own right, having collaborated with stars like Whitney Houston, Notorious B.I.G., R Kelley and Missy Elliot, but unsurprisingly, the artists themselves found significantly more fame and fortune than the sound engineer. In his 84-page complaint, Mahan demands that he be considered a joint author on the songs that he worked on with Jay Z to create. He also tells a version of the birth of hip-hop itself, its transition into the recording studio and describes the genre’s African-derived musical aesthetics.

Jay Z’s defense

I won’t get into whether Mahan “deserves” to be considered a co-author on these songs or not – such a decision is beyond my expertise and possibly beyond the scope of the law. What I will describe, however, is the two legal defenses being mounted by the hip-hop star’s council, Andrew Bart at Jenner & Block, who is a niche celebrity for his commendable work in a number of high profile cases. Jay Z is first invoking the statute of limitations on copyright cases and second calling into question Mahan’s legal claim to joint authorship, which would require the fulfillment of two criteria. Let’s take a look.

Statute of limitations

There are different statutes of limitations for different crimes, but the limitation for copyright claims is three years. Statutes of limitations are intended to keep lawsuits from being held over the heads of otherwise law abiding citizens and to aid in court efficiency. It isn’t desirable, from a legal standpoint, to allow claims to be made on actions in the distant past, as this can lead to blackmail, extortion or testimony that is simply unreliable due to the passage of time.

By this standard, Mahan’s claim is more than ten years past due. There are some situations in which statutes of limitations are waived, however, and it is on this that Mahan is banking with a suit for declaratory relief. I think that it is unlikely that such relief will be granted, particularly considering the wide distribution that Jay Z’s album received, but it is possible.

Proving joint authorship

If Mahan’s relief were to be granted, the case would then come down to the Second Circuit’s two-part test for establishing joint authorship. Under this test, putative joint authors must show the following.

  1. The collaborators intended to create a joint work.
  2. Each collaborator made independently copyrightable contributions to the end product.

Mahan’s case goes into detail proving the second element of this test – I think that he has a solid case. However, his complaint fails to allege any facts that would demonstrate both he and Jay Z intended to create a joint work. While this may seem like a raw technicality, it is here that Mahan’s case falls down. I expect that, one way or another, the court will find in favor of Jay Z.

Last year, I wrote a post regarding Jay-Z’s legal bouts when he allegedly broke sports agent laws last year. As a sports & entertainment attorney, I detailed the events of the case fairly closely, if you are interested in finding out the full story you can check it out here:

Follow up with the legal bouts of other famous hip-hop artists with some of these previous posts:

  • Snoop Dogg in Hot Water Over Labor Laws
  • Kanye West Faces Copyright Infringement Lawsuit
  • Rick Ross Stage Name Protected Under First Amendment
  • Beastie Boys Lawsuit Highlights When Sampling Can Constitute Copyright Infringement

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests post image

Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests

If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]

Author: Christopher D. Warren

Link to post with title - "Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests"
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions post image

The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions

Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions"
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public post image

Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public

Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public"
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions post image

Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions

Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]

Author: Dan Brecher

Link to post with title - "Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions"
Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide post image

Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide

For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]

Author: Bryce S. Robins

Link to post with title - "Crypto Compliance: A Comprehensive Guide"
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination post image

Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]

Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh

Link to post with title - "Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!