Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 4, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMembers represented in a class-action lawsuit against social media giant Facebook may be entitled to a $10 payout after the networking site agreed to a $20 million-dollar settlement.
The class-action lawsuit revolves around Facebook’s use of members’ names, photos, likenesses and identities in sponsored ads without their permission. This scenario became an issue when the website went public, and members started inquiring about when they would receive payments for Facebook’s use of their information. The social networking site consequently agreed to settle the matter for $20 million outside of court.
While Facebook agreed to the settlement – which may boil down to a payout of $10 per member affected by the lawsuit – some analysts say that many members may be unaware of their rights or of the business law issue itself. Many users may have received an email message from individuals claiming to be part of Facebook’s legal team, and automatically theorized that the content was spam and deleted it. However, the message coming from legalnotice@facebookmail.com is a valid notification that alerts affected members of the settlement and provides instructions on how to claim a portion of the proceeds.
There is one catch, however, that may limit members from receiving their share of the payout. Facebook stipulated in the settlement agreement that if too many people submitted claims for the $10, it would donate the entirety of the funds to charity. While Facebook did not provide a concrete number outlining how many claims is too many, it released a statement explaining that as soon as it becomes “economically infeasible to pay money to persons who make a timely and valid claim,” the whole of the funds would be donated to a not-for-profit organization.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!