Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 4, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comMembers represented in a class-action lawsuit against social media giant Facebook may be entitled to a $10 payout after the networking site agreed to a $20 million-dollar settlement.
The class-action lawsuit revolves around Facebook’s use of members’ names, photos, likenesses and identities in sponsored ads without their permission. This scenario became an issue when the website went public, and members started inquiring about when they would receive payments for Facebook’s use of their information. The social networking site consequently agreed to settle the matter for $20 million outside of court.
While Facebook agreed to the settlement – which may boil down to a payout of $10 per member affected by the lawsuit – some analysts say that many members may be unaware of their rights or of the business law issue itself. Many users may have received an email message from individuals claiming to be part of Facebook’s legal team, and automatically theorized that the content was spam and deleted it. However, the message coming from legalnotice@facebookmail.com is a valid notification that alerts affected members of the settlement and provides instructions on how to claim a portion of the proceeds.
There is one catch, however, that may limit members from receiving their share of the payout. Facebook stipulated in the settlement agreement that if too many people submitted claims for the $10, it would donate the entirety of the funds to charity. While Facebook did not provide a concrete number outlining how many claims is too many, it released a statement explaining that as soon as it becomes “economically infeasible to pay money to persons who make a timely and valid claim,” the whole of the funds would be donated to a not-for-profit organization.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!