Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 2, 2013
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comVideo game producer Electronic Arts Sports and Collegiate Licensing Company have agreed to pay out roughly $40 million to former players whose likenesses were used without authorization and compensation.
The settlement agreement will settle disputes against EA Sports and CLC, leaving the National Collegiate Athletic Association as the lone defendant in the controversial sports law dispute. The outcome of the case, filed by the former UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon, may carry significant implications for the future of college athletics and make it possible for players to lobby for a share of the multi billion-dollar profits generated by the sports industry.
As the NCAA has said it plans to fight the lawsuit vigorously and is confident in its position, the settlement between EA Sports and former players may have a broad impact on the association. Although EA Sports will not officially admit to any wrongdoing as part of the agreement, settlements typically denote some measure of acknowledgement or support for plaintiffs’ claims. If the NCAA loses its case or agrees to settle, the central question of whether college sports fall into the amateurism category may be challenged.
Legal analysts for the NCAA have long argued that because college sports fall into the amateur, rather than professional, realm, players are not entitled to compensation. Should the courts rule that players whose likenesses are used must be compensated, athletes may begin demanding payment any time their names or identifying characteristics appear on sports merchandise, games, music, movies, and other items.
Following the settlement – which has not yet detailed how the $40 million will be distributed among former players – the NCAA told USA Today that it is “not prepared to compromise on this case.” The association reaffirmed its position, and said that it its prepared to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!