Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 28, 2014
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comBut what happens when that speech does not align with the personal views and opinions of the majority of the public? More importantly, what happens when the person expressing those views is smack dab in the center of the public eye?
Recently, there has been an influx of cases in which celebrities have been ridiculed for expressing their personal beliefs, both publicly and behind closed doors. Following public outrage, many of these celebrities were suspended from their respective roles and positions.
There have been a number of notable cases in which celebrities have been hoisted from their roles following opinionated comments. Phil Robertson, star of the show Duck Dynasty, was suspended from the reality TV show after making a series of homophobic and bigoted remarks which were eventually published in GQ magazine.
Was Robinson entitled to express his own views? He was—but he was not entitled to keeping his job after doing so. Since Robinson’s remarks could have proved costly to the network by which he was employed—A&E—they retained the right to suspend him from the show indefinitely.
The fact of the matter is that the reality-programming trend of recent years has made stars from out of the ordinary, average-Joes. Thus, does it really comes as a shock when these ‘authentic’ people express opinions and values that fail to fit the mold that their networks attempt to create?
The Food Network was faced with a similar predicament when show host and celebrity chef, Paula Deen, was reported to have used racial slurs. The remarks were brought to light after one of Deen’s former employees filed a complaint against her for the behavior, leading to a discrimination lawsuit that was eventually dismissed by a federal judge after a settlement between the parties was reached. The settlement, however, was not enough to save Deen’s Food Network career. She was dropped from the network immediately after the expiration of her contract.
More and more often, celebrities are receiving hits to their income and financial future as a result of things voiced in public. As a result, many stars, in both the sports and entertainment industries, have begun using spokespersons in order to prevent themselves from being held accountable for anything they say—that could so easily be ill perceived.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
But what happens when that speech does not align with the personal views and opinions of the majority of the public? More importantly, what happens when the person expressing those views is smack dab in the center of the public eye?
Recently, there has been an influx of cases in which celebrities have been ridiculed for expressing their personal beliefs, both publicly and behind closed doors. Following public outrage, many of these celebrities were suspended from their respective roles and positions.
There have been a number of notable cases in which celebrities have been hoisted from their roles following opinionated comments. Phil Robertson, star of the show Duck Dynasty, was suspended from the reality TV show after making a series of homophobic and bigoted remarks which were eventually published in GQ magazine.
Was Robinson entitled to express his own views? He was—but he was not entitled to keeping his job after doing so. Since Robinson’s remarks could have proved costly to the network by which he was employed—A&E—they retained the right to suspend him from the show indefinitely.
The fact of the matter is that the reality-programming trend of recent years has made stars from out of the ordinary, average-Joes. Thus, does it really comes as a shock when these ‘authentic’ people express opinions and values that fail to fit the mold that their networks attempt to create?
The Food Network was faced with a similar predicament when show host and celebrity chef, Paula Deen, was reported to have used racial slurs. The remarks were brought to light after one of Deen’s former employees filed a complaint against her for the behavior, leading to a discrimination lawsuit that was eventually dismissed by a federal judge after a settlement between the parties was reached. The settlement, however, was not enough to save Deen’s Food Network career. She was dropped from the network immediately after the expiration of her contract.
More and more often, celebrities are receiving hits to their income and financial future as a result of things voiced in public. As a result, many stars, in both the sports and entertainment industries, have begun using spokespersons in order to prevent themselves from being held accountable for anything they say—that could so easily be ill perceived.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!