Patagonia Has Joined Nonprofit Environmental Groups and Native American Tribes in Challenging the Trump Administration’s Decision to Reduce the Size of Certain National Monuments
Patagonia has joined nonprofit environmental groups and Indian tribes in challenging the Trump Administration’s decision to reduce the size of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments. When you visit the outdoor retailer’s website, a black screen now appears with the words “The President Stole Your Land.”
According to Patagonia, it has a vested interest in preserving the monument. It previously donated $800,000 to advocacy groups that helped establish Bears Ears. The company has also conducted employee retreats at the monument and performed product testing there. This spring, the retailer released a film that provides a virtual tour of Bears Ears.
The company also maintains that its environmental preservation efforts give it standing to sue. In a statement published in , CEO Rose Marcario emphasized that Patagonia is a benefit corporation and its articles of incorporation mandate that it confronts environmental threats.
Patagonia also maintains that the suit is necessary to protect its business interests. “Patagonia’s business relies directly on public lands, like Indian Creek in Bears Ears, which hosts world-class climbing,” Marcario wrote. “Powered by national monuments, national parks and other special public lands that draw millions of visitors a year, outdoor recreation is America’s fourth-largest industry — driving $887 billion in annual consumer spending and 7.6 million jobs, according to the Outdoor Industry Association.”
Unique Characteristics of Benefit Corporations
Patagonia’s suit is novel in that the company is relying on its corporate structure to challenge the monument reversal. Benefit corporations allow businesses to consider profit as well as society and the environment. The special form of incorporation is available in more than 20 states, including New Jersey.
The primary advantage of incorporating as a benefit corporation is flexibility. The directors of the company are not required to exclusively focus on financial interests. In addition, they are free to address social and environmental impacts without fear of facing legal liability.
Becoming a benefit corporation can also enhance a company’s bottom-line. Consumers increasingly prefer to purchase products and services from businesses that are perceived to be “good citizens.” Including social accountability in the very fiber of the company is a great way for companies to differentiate themselves in a crowded marketplace and can also help attract employees.
President’s Authority to Reduce Size of National Monuments
In addition to determining whether Patagonia has the standing to sue, the case will ultimately decide whether the President has the legal authority to abolish or reduce national monuments created by past presidents. The Antiquities Act of 1906 expressly authorizes the President to “declare by public proclamation historic landmarks, historic and prehistoric structures, and other objects of historic or scientific interest that are situated upon the lands owned or controlled by the Government of the United States to be national monuments.” On September 24, 1906, President Roosevelt designated Devils Tower in Wyoming as the country’s first national monument. Sixteen other presidents have relied on the Antiquities Act to establish more than 100 national monuments.
Upon taking office, President Trump issued an executive order directing Interior Secretary Zinke to review monuments created by Presidents Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, and Barack Obama. Earlier this month, President Trump signed two proclamations reducing the size of Utah’s Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument.
Presidents have modified the boundaries to remove lands from monuments 18 times in the past. However, as the Congressional Research Service concluded in a 2016 report, it is unclear if presidents have the power to rescind designations made by their predecessors.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Robert Levy, at 201-806-3364.
Dissolving Your Business: Essential Legal Steps to Protect Your Interests
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
The Role of Corporate Restructuring in Mergers & Acquisitions
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
