Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: April 16, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comApparently, back in March 2015, Google had to respond to the Wall Street Journal‘s report of how often Google held meetings with the White House (230 times to be exact, since Obama took office). Google’s response claimed that there were several different topics of conversation discussed over the course of these meetings, and that nothing shady was going on. However, speculation persists that the timing of these meetings in relation to other key events is extremely suspicious because a large number of these meetings occurred just before antitrust investigations on Google halted back in 2013. Google holds strong in saying that these meetings had nothing to do with the antitrust allegations.
The plot thickens as new reports, this time from The New York Times, reveal that Microsoft has connections, to varying degrees, with three of the initial complainants that spurred the antitrust investigation into Google.
SO, the main point of suspicion: Upsurge in the number of meetings just before U.S. antitrust investigations into Google ended in 2013, the end result of which was zero action.
Questions are now being raised about White House involvement in U.S. investigations into Google, and the Senate has decided to investigate. According to a recent article, “[a] Senate panel plans to investigate whether the White House inappropriately derailed a federal investigation into accusations that Google was stifling online competition.” If there were any truth to this theory, this may have a significant impact on Google’s business and the White House’s integrity.
Google’s troubles do not end there. It was announced on April 14, 2015 that Google is expected to face new antitrust charges from the European Commission. The charges allege that Google has been using its dominant position as a search engine to favor its services/products over those of other companies. Margrethe Vestager is currently the European Union’s top antitrust official and will be deciding what route the allegations will take.
Current discussion on the issue suggests that this is only the beginning of Europe taking on large American companies. European companies have yet to rival the success of several of America’s superpowers, such as Google – so this may also be a pointed effort at giving Europe’s own home grown companies a competitive edge. Regardless, Google is presently under a very large and powerful microscope and, potentially, in a lot of trouble. (Notwithstanding, of course, reports about Google’s message to its employees on Tuesday that it had a “very strong case” and is expected to defend itself robustly in what could become one of the most contentious antitrust cases since the EU took on Microsoft 10 years ago).
###
Do you have any feedback, thoughts, reactions or comments concerning this topic? Feel free to leave a comment below and follow the twitter accounts @CyberPinguelo, @eWHW_Blog, @S_H_Law. If you have any questions about this post or would like assistance with your data security/privacy and related efforts, please contact Fernando M. Pinguelo or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouse Watch – Where Technology, Politics, and Privacy Collide.
Fernando acknowledges the notable contribution to this article from Ms. Jenna Methven, Chief Blog Correspondent and Blogger for eWhiteHouse Watch and a Monmouth University student.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!