
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.com
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe international body responsible for regulating the Internet, ICANN, continues to roll out new generic top-level domains (gTLD) that expand the Internet from the traditional .com and .org domains. While the new gTLDs offer new and exciting branding opportunities, they also come with legal headaches for trademark owners.
The latest gTLD to roll out is one of the most controversial: .SUCKS. Starting on March 30, 2015, the 30-day “sunrise period” for the gTLD opened, which gives trademark owners the first opportunity to register .SUCKS using their marks. After June 1, 2015, the new domain will be available to the general public.
While many of the new gTLDs have generated concerns about cybersquatters —entities that seek to turn profits by hijacking the trademarks and domain names of well-known companies — critics are also raising concerns about how the .SUCKS domains are being sold.
Under the pricing scheme established by Vox Populi, companies that are already registered with the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) must pay $2,500 to register the domain during the sunrise period and again every year they renew (nearly $12,500 for a 5-year sunrise registration). Companies that do not take advantage of the early registration but are dubbed “premium brands” will also pay the same hefty registration fees to protect their intellectual property. Meanwhile, the general public can scoop up a website for less than $250.
Last year, then-U.S. Sen. John D. “Jay” Rockefeller IV characterized the domain as “little more than a predatory shakedown scheme.” In his letter to ICANN, the lawmaker raised concerns that the business model behind the domain was designed to force well-known companies and organizations to “pay ongoing fees to avoid seeing the phrase ‘sucks’ appended to their names on the Internet.”
More recently, the Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) sent a letter to ICANN asking it to halt the rollout of the new .SUCKS gTLD. It maintains that Vox Populi’s predatory pricing scheme was devised solely to make money off the backs of brand owners. It further alleges that the pricing structure “creates a mockery of the new TLD process and calls into question the very ability of ICANN as an organization to be able to administer the new gTLD program.”
Despite the public pressure, ICANN is unlikely to halt the registration of .SUCKS. So if your budget allows, and your brand merits it, you may want to at least consider “defensive” registrations. As noted above, registering the new domain is expensive, particularly since you are unlikely to use it. However, it is the best way to help ensure that another company does not capitalize on your brand or trademark.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!